|
|
Post by inger on May 29, 2024 21:19:30 GMT -5
Well, Boone said there were a lot worse umpires than Angel Hernandez. Case in point tonight on a ridiculous infield fly rule call. This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. It did not appear to be I be intentional, Soto circled around him… |
|
|
|
Post by presceo on May 29, 2024 21:20:13 GMT -5
nice job moving Stanton to cleanup
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on May 29, 2024 21:20:56 GMT -5
This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. It did not appear to be I be intentional, Soto circled around him… Be I be? Let it be so… |
|
|
|
Post by qwik3457bb on May 29, 2024 21:21:21 GMT -5
Change bounced to Stanton, 1-0
Change bounced again, 2-0
Misjudges the FB running inside, jams himself, and the low pop bounces to Schnauel, who takes it to the bag to end the inning.
1-2-3 for Anderson on 13 pitches and 53 through 3.
Bottom 3, 0-0
8-9-1 for the Angels: Neto, Guillorme and Schnauel.
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on May 29, 2024 21:21:29 GMT -5
nice job moving Stanton to cleanup I don’t understand it.. |
|
|
|
Post by chiyankee on May 29, 2024 21:22:07 GMT -5
Well, Boone said there were a lot worse umpires than Angel Hernandez. Case in point tonight on a ridiculous infield fly rule call. This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. You would think one of the four umpires would have seen Soto trying to go around Neto, then see Neto intentionally back into Soto and then intentionally drop the ball to get a DP call. |
|
|
|
Post by qwik3457bb on May 29, 2024 21:22:13 GMT -5
Jays beat the White Sox 3-1.
Rays got a run in the bottom of the 9th on a single by Siri, and beat the A's 4-3.
|
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on May 29, 2024 21:23:00 GMT -5
Anderson, what with the double foot pump? He's doing the Elaine dance from Seinfeld. |
|
|
|
Post by qwik3457bb on May 29, 2024 21:23:01 GMT -5
Neto...
Change low, 1-0
FB waist high outer 3rd, fouled, 1-1
Slider just outside, rolled over to DJ, takes a beat, makes a good throw to Rizzo, 1 down.
|
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on May 29, 2024 21:23:09 GMT -5
Well, Boone said there were a lot worse umpires than Angel Hernandez. Case in point tonight on a ridiculous infield fly rule call. This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. I believe Boone asked the right question, which was where was Soto supposed to go? Soto intentionally went behind Neto to the back of the bag, rather than straight to the bag. Neto misjudged the pop fly moving backwards toward the bag. Neto would have collided with Soto standing on second regardless. |
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on May 29, 2024 21:23:47 GMT -5
This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. You would think one of the four umpires would have seen Soto trying to go around Neto, then see Neto intentionally back into Soto and then intentionally drop the ball to get a DP call. Maybe if we had one competent ump out of the four. |
|
|
|
Post by qwik3457bb on May 29, 2024 21:24:11 GMT -5
Guillorme...
FB low, 1-0
FB on the outside corner above the knees, taken for a strike, 1-1
Fb outside, 2-1
FB well high, outer half, 3-1
FB outside middle above the knees, 3-2
FB yanked low on the inner 3rd, ball 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by laurenfrances on May 29, 2024 21:24:28 GMT -5
Is Kay suggesting to limiting Gil by placing him in the pen when Cole returns?
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on May 29, 2024 21:24:33 GMT -5
This one is apparently called correctly. If Soto is standing on the base and makes no motion to interfer, the no interference can be called. But Soto lunged back to the bag late and they bumped. If the ump says that interference is intentional, then the call is correct. You would think one of the four umpires would have seen Soto trying to go around Neto, then see Neto intentionally back into Soto and then intentionally drop the ball to get a DP call. I don’t know if Neto is that game aware, but if he is, let’s trade for him… |
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on May 29, 2024 21:24:46 GMT -5
It did not appear to be I be intentional, Soto circled around him… Be I be? Let it be so… The original title of the McCartney song: "Be I Be." Little known fact... |
|
