|
|
Post by greatfatness on Aug 11, 2019 12:06:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by greatfatness on Aug 11, 2019 12:07:55 GMT -5
First Holder and now Tarpley. Boone overextends both these relievers and they both end up on the IL, what a shocker. I don’t buy the Tarpley injury to be honest. Any pitcher can have evidence of elbow inflammation. He threw 50 pitches pretty effortlessly. His command was poor but it usually is. Seems like this could be a wink and a nod move to just open a roster spot to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 13:04:05 GMT -5
If I understand the rule correctly Stanton is now lost for the season. Which has some up sides in honesty. But it is weird to come back for a week then be gone for the season.
|
|
|
|
Post by chiyankee on Aug 11, 2019 13:15:13 GMT -5
If I understand the rule correctly Stanton is now lost for the season. Which has some up sides in honesty. But it is weird to come back for a week then be gone for the season. No, they still expect Stanton back in September. They would need to make room for him on the 40 man roster when he's ready to play, the same with Severino and Betances. |
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 13:34:29 GMT -5
This is the rule I was referring to. Is this incorrect? "The player may not rejoin the active roster until the minimum 10 or 60 days has elapsed; however, a player's time on the injured list may exceed the specified number of days, and, further, if a player is transferred to the 60-day injured list after August 1, he may not return to the active roster that season." Obviously it is after August 1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injured_list |
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 11, 2019 14:03:22 GMT -5
This is the rule I was referring to. Is this incorrect? "The player may not rejoin the active roster until the minimum 10 or 60 days has elapsed; however, a player's time on the injured list may exceed the specified number of days, and, further, if a player is transferred to the 60-day injured list after August 1, he may not return to the active roster that season." Obviously it is after August 1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injured_listI know the Wikipedia article says that, but I went to the mlb site and saw no mention of that rule. I would be shocked if the Yankees front office made a mistake like that. |
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 14:03:44 GMT -5
Interesting they decided to go back to the 15 day IL next year from 10
|
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 14:09:26 GMT -5
This is the rule I was referring to. Is this incorrect? "The player may not rejoin the active roster until the minimum 10 or 60 days has elapsed; however, a player's time on the injured list may exceed the specified number of days, and, further, if a player is transferred to the 60-day injured list after August 1, he may not return to the active roster that season." Obviously it is after August 1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injured_listI know the Wikipedia article says that, but I went to the mlb site and saw no mention of that rule. I would be shocked if the Yankees front office made a mistake like that. I have not found it anywhere either. It would make more sense if it was a rule if it was after Sept 1 |
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 11, 2019 14:11:33 GMT -5
Interesting they decided to go back to the 15 day IL next year from 10 That's to stop the manipulation of the 10-day IL to move pitchers around. By returning to the 15 day standard, teams will be reluctant to give a starting pitcher a quick rest by missing just one start as happens now. |
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 14:17:53 GMT -5
Yeah Assuming Wikipedia is not wrong on the 60 day rules (and I would guess they are wrong) perhaps the fact that Stanton was already on the IL makes the difference "Stanton’s transfer to the 60-day IL is more of a formality than an indicator of any new health problems. He was already known to be out until September, and because his initial 10-day IL placement occurred June 26, he’ll be eligible to return August 26. " www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/08/yankees-select-brady-lail-and-joe-mantiply.html |
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Aug 11, 2019 15:24:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 17:52:33 GMT -5
Amazing they still don't know if Voit will have to have surgery or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on Aug 11, 2019 19:45:51 GMT -5
Amazing they still don't know if Voit will have to have surgery or not. Why is that amazing? It’s the human body. Not everything is abundantly clear when illness or injury occurs. With that attitude toward the medical community, if I were your doctor I’d buy a special policy from Lloyd’s of London in anticipation of your eventual lawsuit... |
|
|
|
Post by greatfatness on Aug 11, 2019 20:15:55 GMT -5
Amazing they still don't know if Voit will have to have surgery or not. Why is that amazing? It’s the human body. Not everything is abundantly clear when illness or injury occurs. With that attitude toward the medical community, if I were your doctor I’d buy a special policy from Lloyd’s of London in anticipation of your eventual lawsuit... I don't see what's so complicated. If he has surgery now, he's done for the year. If he doesn't he might recover without surgery sufficiently to play this season and he might not. It isn't that hard to figure out they have some +EV if they wait and none if they don't. |
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Aug 11, 2019 21:25:40 GMT -5
Amazing they still don't know if Voit will have to have surgery or not. Why is that amazing? It’s the human body. Not everything is abundantly clear when illness or injury occurs. With that attitude toward the medical community, if I were your doctor I’d buy a special policy from Lloyd’s of London in anticipation of your eventual lawsuit... Its been weeks. Its a physical injury not a virus or cancer, or other exotic unknown condition. What are they going discover going forward they don't know now. |
|
