|
|
Post by domeplease on Nov 18, 2020 19:54:03 GMT -5
INGER: So the Velociraptor is real & alive in your area. RIGHT!!!
I thought we had an AGREEMENT that if you found Magic Mushrooms you would save them for me -- NOT EAT THEM YOURSELF!!!
AM I THROWING GOOD $$$ AFTER LOST $$$?
MY GOLF BETS THIS WEEKEND (maybe I am like Inger & seeing Velociraptors???)
RSM CLASSIC
--Sungjae Im 22-1 $2,000
--Fitzpatrick 30-1 $2,000
--English 30-1 $1,500
--Oosthuizen 30-1 $1,500
--Connors 35-1 $1,200
--Munoz 40-1 $800
--Kisner 40-1 $800
--Frittelli 60-1 $800
--Mackenzie Hughes 70-1 $800
--Reavie 80-1 $600
--Noren 80-1 $500
--Grillo 1001 $500
--Gay 150-1 $500
--Bello 200-1 $500
$14,000 BET
Umm, no. I did not see the dinosaur myself. Never have. What do I think of your picks? I think I hope that turns around for you... INGER: I like my picks--but the way my luck has been running = I think I will see a Dinosaur before I win again = SHIT!!! |
|
|
|
Post by domeplease on Nov 21, 2020 16:14:51 GMT -5
NOT GOOD so far!!! Need a miracle...
RSM CLASSIC
--Sungjae Im 22-1 $2,000 CUT
--Fitzpatrick 30-1 $2,000 CUT
--English 30-1 $1,500
--Oosthuizen 30-1 $1,500 CUT
--Connors 35-1 $1,200
--Munoz 40-1 $800 CUT
--Kisner 40-1 $800
--Frittelli 60-1 $800 CUT
--Hughes 70-1 $800 CUT
--Reavie 80-1 $600 CUT
--Noren 80-1 $500
--Grillo 100-1 $500
--Gay 150-1 $500
--Bello 200-1 $500
$14,000 BET
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on Nov 21, 2020 19:46:54 GMT -5
NOT GOOD so far!!! Need a miracle...
RSM CLASSIC
--Sungjae Im 22-1 $2,000 CUT
--Fitzpatrick 30-1 $2,000 CUT
--English 30-1 $1,500
--Oosthuizen 30-1 $1,500 CUT
--Connors 35-1 $1,200
--Munoz 40-1 $800 CUT
--Kisner 40-1 $800
--Frittelli 60-1 $800 CUT
--Hughes 70-1 $800 CUT
--Reavie 80-1 $600 CUT
--Noren 80-1 $500
--Grillo 100-1 $500
--Gay 150-1 $500
--Bello 200-1 $500
$14,000 BET
When one plays only long shots, one can expect it to see many of his players miss the cut. One can also expect to be long-suffering in expectation of losing. I had a fellow tell me once (he was a big better on the horses), that in his estimation it was usually best in the long run to bet only the horses that were at the bottom of the top third of the field. In that position, he felt the odds were just long enough and the chances of a win were great enough to cash a ticket now and again. The addictive nature of the sport pushes people to want that alluring big check win of the long odds. Ignore the long odds and the short odds. You should win enough to break even or lose only modest amounts while perhaps having the good fortune of hitting a nice 7-1 or 10-1 check along the way for a decent payday. Do yourself a favor and peruse your bets for the past several tournaments and see what would have happened if you would have limited yourself to picking from the top 20-25th odds. Let’s see if you’d be better off... 😎 |
|
|
|
Post by inger on Nov 21, 2020 20:49:00 GMT -5
Thinking some more about the formulaic betting approach in the former post, I think I would personally follow that with a couple of twists. I would also take both the third shortest and third longest shots in the field. That would re-introduce the element of having one long shot, while also betting on a more likely winner that usually still has decent enough odds to at least give a decent shot breaking even, or making a small gain.
The problem of course is that this formula doesn’t allow “hunch bets”, unless you wish to give yourself permission to always add one, two, or three hunches...
|
|
|
|
Post by domeplease on Nov 23, 2020 11:23:45 GMT -5
IT was CLOSE -- almost had a Miracle -- Kisner loss in play-off -- so damn close but yet so far away.
I am hoping I can shit more $$$ ???!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by inger on Nov 23, 2020 13:34:24 GMT -5
IT was CLOSE -- almost had a Miracle -- Kisner loss in play-off -- so damn close but yet so far away.
I am hoping I can shit more $$$ ???!!!
Wow. If you do find a way to sh*t money... and if it comes out clean... please let us know how... |
|
