|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 11:24:07 GMT -5
Another thought occurred to me about 1965 -- Mel Allen had been let go as the Voice of the Yankees following the 1964 season, even though he was only 51 years old. To this day no definitive explanation has been given, although there are plenty of theories -- he was drinking too much, he was rambling more during the broadcasts, ripping the team, he was becoming angry and alienating people, he'd sent Mantle to a quack doctor for an injection that kept Mick basically out of the 61 Series -- it certainly crushed him to lose that job, even though he did have a second act with "This Week In Baseball" and actually did occasional Yankee broadcasts, including doing play by play for Dave Righetti's no-hitter in 1983. Mel was replaced for three seasons by Joe Garagiola, which helped ease the transition because Garagiola was a friend of Yogi's and was very popular. Unfortunately his three years were all losing seasons for the Yanks. He was replaced by the consummate professional Frank Messer in 1968. Hey, anything else you want to know about 1965, I'll be here all week.
|
|
|
Post by Renfield on Aug 16, 2023 11:46:10 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! I was just beginning to follow the Yankees during that time so my memories are much more vague. At some point around then, I learned to read the box scores and would anxiously await the morning paper. Of course, the west coast games' box score wouldn't appear until the next morning. The afternoon paper didn't carry box scores.
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Aug 16, 2023 12:33:44 GMT -5
Another thought occurred to me about 1965 -- Mel Allen had been let go as the Voice of the Yankees following the 1964 season, even though he was only 51 years old. To this day no definitive explanation has been given, although there are plenty of theories -- he was drinking too much, he was rambling more during the broadcasts, ripping the team, he was becoming angry and alienating people, he'd sent Mantle to a quack doctor for an injection that kept Mick basically out of the 61 Series -- it certainly crushed him to lose that job, even though he did have a second act with "This Week In Baseball" and actually did occasional Yankee broadcasts, including doing play by play for Dave Righetti's no-hitter in 1983. Mel was replaced for three seasons by Joe Garagiola, which helped ease the transition because Garagiola was a friend of Yogi's and was very popular. Unfortunately his three years were all losing seasons for the Yanks. He was replaced by the consummate professional Frank Messer in 1968. Hey, anything else you want to know about 1965, I'll be here all week. Thanks pipps! Really informative last two posts about 1965. You were what 30 years old back then? I kid I kid.
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 12:39:39 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! I was just beginning to follow the Yankees during that time so my memories are much more vague. At some point around then, I learned to read the box scores and would anxiously await the morning paper. Of course, the west coast games' box score wouldn't appear until the next morning. The afternoon paper didn't carry box scores. For sure Ren, news traveled more slowly then (but it always got there.) The box score is one of the greatest inventions in history IMO. We had to wait for the Sunday sports section to get the batting and pitching records. And it would always have the disclaimer about not including late Saturday games. I would start at the bottom and work up, hoping there wouldn't be too many Yankees on the lower rungs. Too bad you just missed the end of the incredible 49-64 dynasty. When you grow up with that, having an outside shot at a third wild card just doesn't get the juices flowing. I know you are a student of rock history. Some big hits from that year were "Satisfaction," "Can't Help Myself," "My Girl," "You Were On My Mind," "Help Me Rhonda," "Hang On Sloopy," "Help," and my personal favorite "Wooly Bully." Good times.
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 12:44:02 GMT -5
Another thought occurred to me about 1965 -- Mel Allen had been let go as the Voice of the Yankees following the 1964 season, even though he was only 51 years old. To this day no definitive explanation has been given, although there are plenty of theories -- he was drinking too much, he was rambling more during the broadcasts, ripping the team, he was becoming angry and alienating people, he'd sent Mantle to a quack doctor for an injection that kept Mick basically out of the 61 Series -- it certainly crushed him to lose that job, even though he did have a second act with "This Week In Baseball" and actually did occasional Yankee broadcasts, including doing play by play for Dave Righetti's no-hitter in 1983. Mel was replaced for three seasons by Joe Garagiola, which helped ease the transition because Garagiola was a friend of Yogi's and was very popular. Unfortunately his three years were all losing seasons for the Yanks. He was replaced by the consummate professional Frank Messer in 1968. Hey, anything else you want to know about 1965, I'll be here all week. Thanks pipps! Really informative last two posts about 1965. You were what 30 years old back then? I kid I kid. No, still in high school, having fun with guitars, baseball and cherry bombs. Which unbelievably were easy to get. How many mailboxes and school toilets could have been saved with tighter ordnance controls.☠️
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Aug 16, 2023 12:50:14 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! Really informative last two posts about 1965. You were what 30 years old back then? I kid I kid. No, still in high school, having fun with guitars, baseball and cherry bombs. Which unbelievably were easy to get. How many mailboxes and school toilets could have been saved with tighter ordnance controls.☠️ pipps, the cherry bomb bandit!
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 13:12:37 GMT -5
No, still in high school, having fun with guitars, baseball and cherry bombs. Which unbelievably were easy to get. How many mailboxes and school toilets could have been saved with tighter ordnance controls.☠️ pipps, the cherry bomb bandit! I think the statute of limitations has expired. As I recall, you were pretty skilled in this area yourself.👹
|
|
|
Post by Renfield on Aug 16, 2023 13:21:58 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! I was just beginning to follow the Yankees during that time so my memories are much more vague. At some point around then, I learned to read the box scores and would anxiously await the morning paper. Of course, the west coast games' box score wouldn't appear until the next morning. The afternoon paper didn't carry box scores. For sure Ren, news traveled more slowly then (but it always got there.) The box score is one of the greatest inventions in history IMO. We had to wait for the Sunday sports section to get the batting and pitching records. And it would always have the disclaimer about not including late Saturday games. I would start at the bottom and work up, hoping there wouldn't be too many Yankees on the lower rungs. Too bad you just missed the end of the incredible 49-64 dynasty. When you grow up with that, having an outside shot at a third wild card just doesn't get the juices flowing. I know you are a student of rock history. Some big hits from that year were "Satisfaction," "Can't Help Myself," "My Girl," "You Were On My Mind," "Help Me Rhonda," "Hang On Sloopy," "Help," and my personal favorite "Wooly Bully." Good times. Good tunes! I would start at the top of the Sunday stats to find the highest Yankee hitter--usually Roy White or Bobby Murcer and for pitchers Stottlemyre or Fritz Peterson, which was a little later, I think. Some of those "awful" stats would look good in today's line-up.
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 13:32:38 GMT -5
For sure Ren, news traveled more slowly then (but it always got there.) The box score is one of the greatest inventions in history IMO. We had to wait for the Sunday sports section to get the batting and pitching records. And it would always have the disclaimer about not including late Saturday games. I would start at the bottom and work up, hoping there wouldn't be too many Yankees on the lower rungs. Too bad you just missed the end of the incredible 49-64 dynasty. When you grow up with that, having an outside shot at a third wild card just doesn't get the juices flowing. I know you are a student of rock history. Some big hits from that year were "Satisfaction," "Can't Help Myself," "My Girl," "You Were On My Mind," "Help Me Rhonda," "Hang On Sloopy," "Help," and my personal favorite "Wooly Bully." Good times. Good tunes! I would start at the top of the Sunday stats to find the highest Yankee hitter--usually Roy White or Bobby Murcer and for pitchers Stottlemyre or Fritz Peterson, which was a little later, I think. Some of those "awful" stats would look good in today's line-up. We believed Mantle had crashed and burned because he hit an unthinkable .255 at the height of the pitcher dominant era. What we had no way of knowing was that he had a .379 OBP and an OPS+ of 137. Bad by his standards, but man could we use a few of those today. Mel and Fritz were solid starters, and Bahnsen helped out a few years later. After those terrible 66-67 teams, the Yankees fluttered around .500 every year until George bought the team in 73. The one exception was 1971 when they won 91 and finished second to an Oriole machine.
|
|
|
Post by Renfield on Aug 16, 2023 14:03:40 GMT -5
Good tunes! I would start at the top of the Sunday stats to find the highest Yankee hitter--usually Roy White or Bobby Murcer and for pitchers Stottlemyre or Fritz Peterson, which was a little later, I think. Some of those "awful" stats would look good in today's line-up. We believed Mantle had crashed and burned because he hit an unthinkable .255 at the height of the pitcher dominant era. What we had no way of knowing was that he had a .379 OBP and an OPS+ of 137. Bad by his standards, but man could we use a few of those today. Mel and Fritz were solid starters, and Bahnsen helped out a few years later. After those terrible 66-67 teams, the Yankees fluttered around .500 every year until George bought the team in 73. The one exception was 1971 when they won 91 and finished second to an Oriole machine. Was '71 the year the O's had 4 20-game winners? Or was that '69?
|
|
|
Post by inger on Aug 16, 2023 14:04:42 GMT -5
Worse. It was a horrible transition from first to last in a ten team league. The aged out players, the injured. The underperforming was on a much worse level. That ‘65 team could never have sniffed .500. And it was glum because there was no way out. No free agency, had no players anyone wanted in trade, so similar in that respect. At least this team COUKD go get an Ohtani, or a Soto this winter and DOES have some good prospects. The ‘65 Yanks werd all out of aces… Inger, I hope this doesn't sound like nit-picking, but what you are describing sounds more like the 66-67 teams than the 1965 team. By an amazing historical coincidence, the 65 Yankees had the exact same record -- 60-60 -- on the exact same date -- August 15 -- as the 2023 Yankees. The team hovered around .500 for most of the year, mostly bubbling a few games under (hitting a low point of seven under in late June) until a modest surge got them as far as two games above (64-62) on August 24. That was unfortunately their high-water mark for the year. The last time they were at .500 was September 3, when they were 68-68. It was like they threw in the towel after that, going 9-17 the rest of the year to finish in sixth place at 77-85. It was their first losing season since 1925, and they would, as you noted, sink to even greater depths in 66-67, finishing tenth and ninth "respectively," if that's the right word to use, with records of 70-89 and 72-90. It was the first time the Yanks had three straight losing seasons since the four from 1912-1915, the transition from the Farrell-Devery ownership (as the Highlanders) to the Ruppert-Huston ownership. That 1965 squad is unfortunately more vivid to me than the 2022 version. Nobody saw it coming -- this group had won five straight pennants, so they had accomplished a lot more than the current gang -- and it wasn't really an old team. Only two regulars were over 30 -- Elston Howard was 36 and Mickey Mantle was 33. But Howard, Mantle, Bobby Richardson and Tony Kubek each had the worst season of their careers up to then. Roger Maris had his broken hand problems that limited him to 40 games and the sapping of his power. Joe Pepitone nosedived from his earlier seasons, although he was only 24 and would in fact bounce back with some more good years afterward. Whitey Ford began to develop arm problems and started to show his age (he was 36) going 16-13 with an ERA+ of 105, which would actually be the worst of his 16 year career. Al Downing and especially Jim Bouton regressed, even though they were only in their mid-20s. Mel Stottlemyre was essentially Gerrit Cole, going 20-9 with an ERA+ of 129. Why we always loved Mel. It was an almost perfect storm of underperformance, and it wasn't helped by first-year manager Johnny Keane, who had replaced the beloved Yogi, and his distant relationship with this established team. Keane really wasn't a bad guy at all, more like a victim of circumstance who was never accorded much respect by a group that was very much set in its ways. All through the season, everyone kept expecting the Yankees to hit the switch -- seasons like this just did not happen to the Yankees -- but it never happened. It was quite shocking. Minnesota ran away with the pennant -- the White Sox were in their accustomed second, seven games out, the Orioles finished eight behind, while the Yankees were a distant 25 games from the top. I think most of us expected a bounce-back in 1966, but they got off to a terrible start, going 4-16 before Keane was fired and Houk came back, which even at that we figured, okay, back to business as usual, but of course it didn't happen (and Houk had burned a lot of bridges as GM with the players who used to love him.) One small bit of sunshine from the 65 team -- 21-year-old Roy White and 19-year-old Bobby Murcer each made their late-season debuts, one day apart, Roy on September 7 and Bobby on September 8. The less-heralded and sometimes unfairly derided Horace Clarke also made his debut that year at the age of 26. Well I got that out of my system. Sorry for the prolix prose. I increasingly believe that there are more similarities between that team and this one than I would have hoped, but still we are talking about different eras, different personalities, so who really knows. We'll find out soon enough. Obviously, you have a much better memory than me, or even probably God. I don’t know how you do it. 😀 Yes, you are correct , I had super-imposed my memory of that collapse into a mish-mash of what happened. I know it was sad, and I know I was only 11 years old and thought the Yankees were just supposed to win. At some point the Yankees announced that they were entering a 5-year rebuilding plan, the first I had ever heard of such a thing. My eldest brother, who never watched baseball would forever torture me over this concept of rebuilding and boast loudly that they would remain at the bottom of the standings forever…
|
|
|
Post by inger on Aug 16, 2023 14:13:13 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! I was just beginning to follow the Yankees during that time so my memories are much more vague. At some point around then, I learned to read the box scores and would anxiously await the morning paper. Of course, the west coast games' box score wouldn't appear until the next morning. The afternoon paper didn't carry box scores. I was thinking about the way rooting was for a small child back then just a couple days ago. Game is played. You were in school and had no idea who had won. If you were lucky your household received a newspaper with a sports page. Due to print deadlines your team may or may not would be featured sometime with a day or two, and you woukc see if they won or list. Read the box score and try to piece together how it came about. If you didn’t either see the late night sports, which would typically play after you were send to bed, off TV a newspaper, you may never know how a particular game went… It could be frustrating. Then, as a young adult with some discretionary income, you’d get the Sporting News, which would fill you in what you missed the week before…
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 14:20:04 GMT -5
We believed Mantle had crashed and burned because he hit an unthinkable .255 at the height of the pitcher dominant era. What we had no way of knowing was that he had a .379 OBP and an OPS+ of 137. Bad by his standards, but man could we use a few of those today. Mel and Fritz were solid starters, and Bahnsen helped out a few years later. After those terrible 66-67 teams, the Yankees fluttered around .500 every year until George bought the team in 73. The one exception was 1971 when they won 91 and finished second to an Oriole machine. Was '71 the year the O's had 4 20-game winners? Or was that '69? Yep, 1971 -- McNally, Palmer, Cuellar and Pat Dobson. Palmer was the best of the lot but the last to hit 20 that year. Palmer, McNally and Cuellar had previously each won 20 in the same year. Pitching out the wazoo.
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 14:27:21 GMT -5
Inger, I hope this doesn't sound like nit-picking, but what you are describing sounds more like the 66-67 teams than the 1965 team. By an amazing historical coincidence, the 65 Yankees had the exact same record -- 60-60 -- on the exact same date -- August 15 -- as the 2023 Yankees. The team hovered around .500 for most of the year, mostly bubbling a few games under (hitting a low point of seven under in late June) until a modest surge got them as far as two games above (64-62) on August 24. That was unfortunately their high-water mark for the year. The last time they were at .500 was September 3, when they were 68-68. It was like they threw in the towel after that, going 9-17 the rest of the year to finish in sixth place at 77-85. It was their first losing season since 1925, and they would, as you noted, sink to even greater depths in 66-67, finishing tenth and ninth "respectively," if that's the right word to use, with records of 70-89 and 72-90. It was the first time the Yanks had three straight losing seasons since the four from 1912-1915, the transition from the Farrell-Devery ownership (as the Highlanders) to the Ruppert-Huston ownership. That 1965 squad is unfortunately more vivid to me than the 2022 version. Nobody saw it coming -- this group had won five straight pennants, so they had accomplished a lot more than the current gang -- and it wasn't really an old team. Only two regulars were over 30 -- Elston Howard was 36 and Mickey Mantle was 33. But Howard, Mantle, Bobby Richardson and Tony Kubek each had the worst season of their careers up to then. Roger Maris had his broken hand problems that limited him to 40 games and the sapping of his power. Joe Pepitone nosedived from his earlier seasons, although he was only 24 and would in fact bounce back with some more good years afterward. Whitey Ford began to develop arm problems and started to show his age (he was 36) going 16-13 with an ERA+ of 105, which would actually be the worst of his 16 year career. Al Downing and especially Jim Bouton regressed, even though they were only in their mid-20s. Mel Stottlemyre was essentially Gerrit Cole, going 20-9 with an ERA+ of 129. Why we always loved Mel. It was an almost perfect storm of underperformance, and it wasn't helped by first-year manager Johnny Keane, who had replaced the beloved Yogi, and his distant relationship with this established team. Keane really wasn't a bad guy at all, more like a victim of circumstance who was never accorded much respect by a group that was very much set in its ways. All through the season, everyone kept expecting the Yankees to hit the switch -- seasons like this just did not happen to the Yankees -- but it never happened. It was quite shocking. Minnesota ran away with the pennant -- the White Sox were in their accustomed second, seven games out, the Orioles finished eight behind, while the Yankees were a distant 25 games from the top. I think most of us expected a bounce-back in 1966, but they got off to a terrible start, going 4-16 before Keane was fired and Houk came back, which even at that we figured, okay, back to business as usual, but of course it didn't happen (and Houk had burned a lot of bridges as GM with the players who used to love him.) One small bit of sunshine from the 65 team -- 21-year-old Roy White and 19-year-old Bobby Murcer each made their late-season debuts, one day apart, Roy on September 7 and Bobby on September 8. The less-heralded and sometimes unfairly derided Horace Clarke also made his debut that year at the age of 26. Well I got that out of my system. Sorry for the prolix prose. I increasingly believe that there are more similarities between that team and this one than I would have hoped, but still we are talking about different eras, different personalities, so who really knows. We'll find out soon enough. Obviously, you have a much better memory than me, or even probably God. I don’t know how you do it. 😀 Yes, you are correct , I had super-imposed my memory of that collapse into a mish-mash of what happened. I know it was sad, and I know I was only 11 years old and thought the Yankees were just supposed to win. At some point the Yankees announced that they were entering a 5-year rebuilding plan, the first I had ever heard of such a thing. My eldest brother, who never watched baseball would forever torture me over this concept of rebuilding and boast loudly that they would remain at the bottom of the standings forever… Well you were only a year off Inger. Hardly a big deal. My memory is only good for things that happened long ago. Start venturing into the 1990s and the whole thing falls apart. But yeah for the 60s I pretty much remember every day. Not a trait I would recommend. I mean I remember my high school locker combination from 1966, worthless stuff like that. I wish I could forget the 65-67 Yankees. A bad time for you to start following the team. Plus you had to deal with a dominant Orioles team right in your backyard.
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Aug 16, 2023 14:33:38 GMT -5
Thanks pipps! I was just beginning to follow the Yankees during that time so my memories are much more vague. At some point around then, I learned to read the box scores and would anxiously await the morning paper. Of course, the west coast games' box score wouldn't appear until the next morning. The afternoon paper didn't carry box scores. I was thinking about the way rooting was for a small child back then just a couple days ago. Game is played. You were in school and had no idea who had won. If you were lucky your household received a newspaper with a sports page. Due to print deadlines your team may or may not would be featured sometime with a day or two, and you woukc see if they won or list. Read the box score and try to piece together how it came about. If you didn’t either see the late night sports, which would typically play after you were send to bed, off TV a newspaper, you may never know how a particular game went… It could be frustrating. Then, as a young adult with some discretionary income, you’d get the Sporting News, which would fill you in what you missed the week before… Remember The Sporting News used to publish the box scores for every game in the previous week? All the minor league stats at every level. It's no effort to find those things instantly today, but at least for me there was a bigger thrill doing it the old school way. It made more of an impression and felt as if it had greater value.
|
|