|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 12, 2018 18:10:30 GMT -5
Not that I’m offering any support for the idea, but do you guys recall Utah’s proclamation that our country might be close to Civil War? It would appear that the factions at least appear to exist to stir a Civil (or perhaps not so civil) forum War. Geez. When you think about it, the very expression “civil war” is just so odd. From the history I’ve read, that war was anything BUT civil... Ive heard people say some similar things but I just struggle to see how a "War" would manifest itself here. Maybe it would be a cold civil war. I think we are certainly in the midst of a culture war...maybe thats phase one?
|
|
|
Post by inger on Oct 12, 2018 19:02:29 GMT -5
Yes. There is most definitely a clash of cultures in progress. It exists as surely as it did from the moment one tribe discovered fire and the surrounding tribes were frightened by it. We’ll always have rich/poor, right/left, young/old, various races, religions, sexual orientations, ad nauseum...
The clashes will always exist and seem to be the natural order of things...The way societies deal with the differences seems more than anything else to determine our standing in the world...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2018 21:42:49 GMT -5
You know what Chuck, you are right...
The Left isnt for regulating, if not full on silencing of, speech. The Left isnt for repeal of the 2nd amendment. The Left isnt for abandoning the concept of the sovereign nation state. The Left isnt for abolishing the electoral college and the senate; reverting to mob rule. The Left also isnt for legislating from the bench; unless they arent in control of the judiciary in which case they are definitely not for packing the court. The Left isnt for abandoning due process in pursuit of political power. The Left doesnt embrace social justice over blind justice. The Left is not the side that is openly against the one Western democracy in the entire Middle East. The Left isnt advocating for harassing, intimidating, and assaulting public servants that dont agree with them.
The Left most certainly is not for the redistribution of wealth. The Left isnt for a full governmental takeover of the healthcare industry. The Left isnt for abolishing fossil fuels and a takeover of the energy sector to save the planet from climate change. The Left doesnt believe that a society can tax themselves into prosperity. The Left didnt come a hair away from nominating an avowed socialist for the presidency two years ago. The Left isnt lurching further to the Left and closer to socialism by the day...they definitely arent openly embracing socialistic policy. The Left certainly isnt running dozens of avowed socialists in the midterms under the Democrat Party umbrella (not some fringe third party). The head of the Democratic party never said that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a socialist from New York who literally knows nothing and embarrasses herself every time she opens her mouth, is the future of the party.
Progressivism definitely doesnt reject the philosophical principles of the founders and governmental structure established in the Constitution; Woodrow Wilson, one of the forefathers of American Progressivism, definitely did not reject the Constitution as President and consider it an impediment to imposing the Leftist agenda. This did not act as a catalyst for this view (that the Constitution was/is just some outdated document with no merit in the modern world) to be embraced by the mainstream Left. The Left by and large does not embrace the concept of the collective over that of the individual.
But youre right, I just made it all up.
------------------------
I don't know who you are labelling as "the Left", but I do know by reading your warped interpretation of your political opponents beliefs that you are on the fringe of the spectrum, and even people that are moderates to the vast majority of us, would be considered Socialists or even worse, Progressives to you. That you arrogantly put your ideals out there as the truth, according to mich, reveals an intolerance bordering on paranoia and unreasonable fear of others. You may believe that you are part of some sort of vanguard bent on protecting what is sacrosanct in the US, like a firebrand religious cult out of the 1952 McCarthy era, but in reality, like all wide eyed ideologues on both sides, you mainly talk to convince yourselves.
|
|
|
Post by domeplease on Oct 13, 2018 2:10:34 GMT -5
The News Event in the WH on 10-11-18 With Donald & Kanye was like UNREAL: Mr. Bipolar meets Mr. Disorder!!! I wonder, when Kanye walked in, did he say: “Mr. Disorder, I presume…”Maybe, Mr. Disorder will appoint Mr. Bipolar to the vacancy at the UN? OR, appoint Mr. Bipolar, as the Next Atty. General (might be vacant soon)? OR, to the next SC vacancy? YES, Tequila, laugh, for I am. But, do not waste all your laughs, for Mr. Conspiracy should Post soon. --10-12-18: www.msn.com/en-us/music/celebrity/kanye-west-wont-listen-to-pleas-to-get-back-on-meds-amid-unhinged-white-house-rant-source/ar-BBOg8Mt?li=BBnb7Kz Kanye West‘s family is very concerned for the rapper — but doesn’t know what to do or how to help him. During a meeting with Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Thursday, West — who avidly supports and voted for the president in the 2016 election — claimed during a lengthy, televised discussion that he was “misdiagnosed” with bipolar disorder. (The rapper, 41, also recently revealed that he is “off medication” he had previously been taking to treat the disorder.) According to a source close to West, people in his inner circle “are telling him that he needs to get back on his medication, that he’s not doing well, that he’s not making any sense.” “Now he’s in the Oval Office, and he’s doing the same rant, and that’s going to validate his rants,” shares the source. , While family and close friends want to support the father of three, they don’t feel that they’re able to get through to him — in part because of POTUS’ validation. “No one close to him can tell him that he’s sounding unhinged,” says the source, “because his answer is that the President of the United States doesn’t think so.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2018 5:01:51 GMT -5
Domeme, I don’t even know why you give an obviously sick puppy like Kanye any space. It was an awkward meeting between two zoned out individuals. One looked frightened and the other seemed glad of it. It made the infamous Nixon/Elvis hookup look like two neuro surgeons in comparison. Sort of like: Nixon>Trump + Elvis>Kanye = no brainer. Not that any of them are my idea of how to make correct decisions or inspire others to emulate, but I’d rather hang with Nixon or Elvis any day than the other alternatives.
|
|
|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 13, 2018 9:43:27 GMT -5
You know what Chuck, you are right... The Left isnt for regulating, if not full on silencing of, speech. The Left isnt for repeal of the 2nd amendment. The Left isnt for abandoning the concept of the sovereign nation state. The Left isnt for abolishing the electoral college and the senate; reverting to mob rule. The Left also isnt for legislating from the bench; unless they arent in control of the judiciary in which case they are definitely not for packing the court. The Left isnt for abandoning due process in pursuit of political power. The Left doesnt embrace social justice over blind justice. The Left is not the side that is openly against the one Western democracy in the entire Middle East. The Left isnt advocating for harassing, intimidating, and assaulting public servants that dont agree with them. The Left most certainly is not for the redistribution of wealth. The Left isnt for a full governmental takeover of the healthcare industry. The Left isnt for abolishing fossil fuels and a takeover of the energy sector to save the planet from climate change. The Left doesnt believe that a society can tax themselves into prosperity. The Left didnt come a hair away from nominating an avowed socialist for the presidency two years ago. The Left isnt lurching further to the Left and closer to socialism by the day...they definitely arent openly embracing socialistic policy. The Left certainly isnt running dozens of avowed socialists in the midterms under the Democrat Party umbrella (not some fringe third party). The head of the Democratic party never said that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a socialist from New York who literally knows nothing and embarrasses herself every time she opens her mouth, is the future of the party. Progressivism definitely doesnt reject the philosophical principles of the founders and governmental structure established in the Constitution; Woodrow Wilson, one of the forefathers of American Progressivism, definitely did not reject the Constitution as President and consider it an impediment to imposing the Leftist agenda. This did not act as a catalyst for this view (that the Constitution was/is just some outdated document with no merit in the modern world) to be embraced by the mainstream Left. The Left by and large does not embrace the concept of the collective over that of the individual. But youre right, I just made it all up. ------------------------ I don't know who you are labelling as "the Left", but I do know by reading your warped interpretation of your political opponents beliefs that you are on the fringe of the spectrum, and even people that are moderates to the vast majority of us, would be considered Socialists or even worse, Progressives to you. That you arrogantly put your ideals out there as the truth, according to mich, reveals an intolerance bordering on paranoia and unreasonable fear of others. You may believe that you are part of some sort of vanguard bent on protecting what is sacrosanct in the US, like a firebrand religious cult out of the 1952 McCarthy era, but in reality, like all wide eyed ideologues on both sides, you mainly talk to convince yourselves. Yup, whatever you say Chuck. Forgive me for not putting much credence into the psychoanalysis of someone who can never actually muster up a substantive retort and instead just dismisses the other side of debates as conspiratorial paranoia.
|
|
|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 13, 2018 10:56:00 GMT -5
“Hurricane Michael was made more powerful by the unusually warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico—in the same week scientists released a report saying that we must come together to aggressively transition our economy away from fossil fuels and other carbon pollution to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.” - from Bernie Sanders on Thursday
But Joe, you are just paranoid and concocting conspiracies in your own head. No one is saying these things, especially no mainstream voices on the Left.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2018 21:39:34 GMT -5
Geez, Joe.. The waters have been made warm in most part due to human behaviour. Much of that behavior is due to use of fossil fuels. Switching to fuel sources that reduce harmful gasses being emitted will help reduce the greenhouse effect. China, India and there would also have to follow suit. Can we stop with the conspiracies already.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Oct 13, 2018 21:51:55 GMT -5
I don’t know that we know that the waters have been made warm “in most part” due to human behavior. I do believe human behavior to be a contributing factor. Since each extra degree is complicit to the issue, I still support the reduction in usage of fossil fuels. I don’t support a belief that such a reduction is going to solve any of the earth-warming issues. I do believe the measures we take can slow the process to an unknown degree...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2018 22:04:41 GMT -5
Plus, I don’t care what politicians say, whether they are Republicans , Dems, or wide eyed Socialists. If you follow the money, you can pretty much see how their opinions are formulated.
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Oct 14, 2018 6:38:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by domeplease on Oct 14, 2018 7:53:00 GMT -5
You know what Chuck, you are right... The Left isnt for regulating, if not full on silencing of, speech. The Left isnt for repeal of the 2nd amendment. The Left isnt for abandoning the concept of the sovereign nation state. The Left isnt for abolishing the electoral college and the senate; reverting to mob rule. The Left also isnt for legislating from the bench; unless they arent in control of the judiciary in which case they are definitely not for packing the court. The Left isnt for abandoning due process in pursuit of political power. The Left doesnt embrace social justice over blind justice. The Left is not the side that is openly against the one Western democracy in the entire Middle East. The Left isnt advocating for harassing, intimidating, and assaulting public servants that dont agree with them. The Left most certainly is not for the redistribution of wealth. The Left isnt for a full governmental takeover of the healthcare industry. The Left isnt for abolishing fossil fuels and a takeover of the energy sector to save the planet from climate change. The Left doesnt believe that a society can tax themselves into prosperity. The Left didnt come a hair away from nominating an avowed socialist for the presidency two years ago. The Left isnt lurching further to the Left and closer to socialism by the day...they definitely arent openly embracing socialistic policy. The Left certainly isnt running dozens of avowed socialists in the midterms under the Democrat Party umbrella (not some fringe third party). The head of the Democratic party never said that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a socialist from New York who literally knows nothing and embarrasses herself every time she opens her mouth, is the future of the party. Progressivism definitely doesnt reject the philosophical principles of the founders and governmental structure established in the Constitution; Woodrow Wilson, one of the forefathers of American Progressivism, definitely did not reject the Constitution as President and consider it an impediment to imposing the Leftist agenda. This did not act as a catalyst for this view (that the Constitution was/is just some outdated document with no merit in the modern world) to be embraced by the mainstream Left. The Left by and large does not embrace the concept of the collective over that of the individual. But youre right, I just made it all up. ------------------------ I don't know who you are labelling as "the Left", but I do know by reading your warped interpretation of your political opponents beliefs that you are on the fringe of the spectrum, and even people that are moderates to the vast majority of us, would be considered Socialists or even worse, Progressives to you. That you arrogantly put your ideals out there as the truth, according to mich, reveals an intolerance bordering on paranoia and unreasonable fear of others. You may believe that you are part of some sort of vanguard bent on protecting what is sacrosanct in the US, like a firebrand religious cult out of the 1952 McCarthy era, but in reality, like all wide eyed ideologues on both sides, you mainly talk to convince yourselves. Yup, whatever you say Chuck. Forgive me for not putting much credence into the psychoanalysis of someone who can never actually muster up a substantive retort and instead just dismisses the other side of debates as conspiratorial paranoia. JOE: You sooooooooooooooooo Funny. Again thanks for the morning LAUGHS. You would be perfect for Donald's Cabinet. Heck, it would have been 'PRICELESS' to have watched YOU, Kenya & Donald Together.
|
|
|
Post by domeplease on Oct 14, 2018 8:43:31 GMT -5
JUST FOR JOE: YOU might be able to relate to this article...the folks mentioned in this article are PROBABLY all Donald Followers; yes Tequila, you can LAUGH. -10-14-18: www.cbsnews.com/news/the-flat-earth-movement-a-society-of-disbelievers-in-scientific-fact/ If you picture Earth as a ball spinning through space. the folks who recently gathered at a park in Arcadia, California, are eager to argue: you're wrong! Earth is actually "flatter than a pancake," said Nathan Thompson, part of a movement of people who call themselves Flat Earthers. They insist the Earth is, well, flat.
We're living, these folks say, on a disk floating through space, with a tiny sun hovering just overhead. But what about the Earth's curvature? "I don't know. No one's ever seen it," said one man.
"The perimeter of Flat Earth is a wall of ice," said Thompson.
"That's what's holding in the ocean?" asked correspondent Brook Silva-Braga.
"That's what's containing everything," he said. And what's underneath? "Well, you know, we haven't dug that deep," said a Flat Earther named Rene. Netta Hagler, who arranged the meet-up of the Flat Earthers, questioned the fact that Earth is spinning through space at 1,000 miles per hour. "But we can't feel it. I don't believe I'm spinning right now. No," said Hagler. Patricia Steere, who is one of what you might call the "stars" of today's Flat Earth movement (which mostly orbits around YouTube), told Silva-Braga, "Probably most people who hear of it will laugh at it, think we're idiots. But we're not idiots; we're intelligent people from all walks of life and all ages." Flat Earthers have brought levels onto planes (to prove they are flying level), and zoomed in on the moon and "found" clouds supposedly drifting behind it. "Moon is only a few miles up," said one Flat Earth YouTuber. "We've been lied to on such a massive scale!"Steere agreed to play a game of "20 Questions: Cosmic Edition" with Silva-Braga. Photos of the Earth from space? "Completely and utterly false," she said. Is the sun 93 million miles away? "No, the sun is not as far away as we've been told, nor is the moon. They're probably about the same size." Pictures of astronauts floating around on the space station? "Completely fake. Harnesses, wires." Did we really go to the moon? "No. We didn't go to the moon," said Steere. "And we don't have a rover on Mars. And we didn't do a fly-by of Pluto. We've never been to space. Period. End of." In short, Flat Earthers don't believe much of anything unless they see it for themselves. They believe NASA is just part of a broad conspiracy.According to Steere, "It's a giant game of chess. We, all of us in humanity, are the pawns. Part of the whole Flat Earth thing is keeping us locked down, not knowledgeable about who we are, who we really are as people, and what we're capable of." National security expert Tom Nichols, who teaches at the Harvard Extension School, takes a dim view of Flat Earth. He told Silva-Braga he thinks something new is happening: "People have really become obsessed with the idea that, if it's not part of their direct experience, it can't be true.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Oct 14, 2018 17:11:41 GMT -5
I gave you a “like” on this post because I always like to read and learn more. I remain steadfast in my opinion that climate change is natural, but that we are contributing to an unknown degree, as I was already aware that majority of climatologists are sold on pollution taking near to 100% of the blame. I am also aware that without that belief funding for experimentation would be greatly reduced. Like most political issues, as chuck stated in a recent post...follow the money and you’ll understand more...scientists do like them some grant money, yes they do...
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Oct 14, 2018 19:24:55 GMT -5
Grant money is easy to follow; the accounting is both uncomplicated (because the dollars are fairly meager grant to grant) and exhaustive. Also, no one who works with federal grants "likes" them. They are a pain in the ass, and certainly no one "makes money" from grants. Whereas, the DoD has not had a successful audit since...well...ever, and the estimated annual dollars are more than half a trillion.....that's trillion. Read what Major General Smedley Butler - most decorated and the highest ranking (at that time) US Marine - wrote many years ago. Still apt today. link
|
|