|
Post by inger on Apr 28, 2022 21:06:32 GMT -5
No. He doesn’t. He won’t. He wants the Yankees to be deemed cheaters. Once again, masochistic fandom heads it’s ugly rear… I think it was against the rules and the simply did not enforce it, but I could be wrong. I’ll phrase it this way. Just because there is not a written rule on the books does not make an act that is intrinsically wrong right. I think all teams were doing some version of what the Yankees did. If not all, several. It’s not always possible to write a rule that has not yet been violated. Especially when someone discovers a way to utilize relatively new technology. Though it was not against the rules, the use of cameras was an obvious breach of ethical conduct. Once a rule was declared against that conduct the Yankees apparently ceased to act in that non-ethical manner. Your statement that it was against the rules but not enforced missed the mark. And you sir… are granite of cranium… 😜
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Apr 28, 2022 21:32:00 GMT -5
I think it was against the rules and the simply did not enforce it, but I could be wrong. I’ll phrase it this way. Just because there is not a written rule on the books does not make an act that is intrinsically wrong right. I think all teams were doing some version of what the Yankees did. If not all, several. It’s not always possible to write a rule that has not yet been violated. Especially when someone discovers a way to utilize relatively new technology. Though it was not against the rules, the use of cameras was an obvious breach of ethical conduct. Once a rule was declared against that conduct the Yankees apparently ceased to act in that non-ethical manner. Your statement that it was against the rules but not enforced missed the mark. And you sir… are granite of cranium… 😜 What is interesting is that what prompted the letter and Yankees being fined was not the use of cameras, it was the use of the telephone by Rothschild to call to inquire about what was being seen on the cameras.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Apr 28, 2022 21:53:00 GMT -5
I’ll phrase it this way. Just because there is not a written rule on the books does not make an act that is intrinsically wrong right. I think all teams were doing some version of what the Yankees did. If not all, several. It’s not always possible to write a rule that has not yet been violated. Especially when someone discovers a way to utilize relatively new technology. Though it was not against the rules, the use of cameras was an obvious breach of ethical conduct. Once a rule was declared against that conduct the Yankees apparently ceased to act in that non-ethical manner. Your statement that it was against the rules but not enforced missed the mark. And you sir… are granite of cranium… 😜 What is interesting is that what prompted the letter and Yankees being fined was not the use of cameras, it was the use of the telephone by Rothschild to call to inquire about what was being seen on the cameras. Now what’s interesting is that the subject is dead, but the thread won’t die. Dome did a copy and paste on this a month ago, offering to be the electrocutioner before the trial. Then Russ finds it a month later and wants to operate as the hanging judge and won’t accept that there is no body, therefore no crime. Die, you dastardly thread. Die!…
|
|