|
Post by chiyankee on Oct 8, 2017 13:34:23 GMT -5
That was the beginning of the end for Chuck, but he was a big part of their success after the acquired him. Yea, it was all downhill from there. Getting the yips, HGH use, and domestic abuse. Pretty sad. Remember the gum bubble Knoblauch was blowing while the ball was rolling down the base line?
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Oct 8, 2017 16:21:02 GMT -5
Yea, it was all downhill from there. Getting the yips, HGH use, and domestic abuse. Pretty sad. Remember the gum bubble Knoblauch was blowing while the ball was rolling down the base line? [rofl] , classic
|
|
|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 9, 2017 7:10:22 GMT -5
You know I think I was so fired up by this whole situation that I didnt even realize that if the Chisenhall play was challenged and overturned it would have ended the inning because Sanchez caught the ball. This really takes that whole situation to phase two for me. Guy needs to go.
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Oct 9, 2017 8:38:58 GMT -5
You know I think I was so fired up by this whole situation that I didnt even realize that if the Chisenhall play was challenged and overturned it would have ended the inning because Sanchez caught the ball. This really takes that whole situation to phase two for me. Guy needs to go. Yea man, you didn't realize that? That's what made the non-challenge so historically epic! We should have been out of the inning up 8-3!!! We should be up in the series 2-1!!! [img class="smile" alt=" " src="//storage.proboards.com/6828121/images/FiHotxkemjkOUexMSrRn.gif"]
|
|
|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 9, 2017 8:56:06 GMT -5
You know I think I was so fired up by this whole situation that I didnt even realize that if the Chisenhall play was challenged and overturned it would have ended the inning because Sanchez caught the ball. This really takes that whole situation to phase two for me. Guy needs to go. Yea man, you didn't realize that? That's what made the non-challenge so historically epic! We should have been out of the inning up 8-3!!! We should be up in the series 2-1!!! [img alt=" " src="//storage.proboards.com/6828121/images/FiHotxkemjkOUexMSrRn.gif" class="smile"] I think I was so fired up by the removal of CC which I found particularly egregious that it didnt even dawn on me until listening to the BP podcast. Stupid Joe.
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Oct 9, 2017 9:03:10 GMT -5
Yea man, you didn't realize that? That's what made the non-challenge so historically epic! We should have been out of the inning up 8-3!!! We should be up in the series 2-1!!! [img src="//storage.proboards.com/6828121/images/FiHotxkemjkOUexMSrRn.gif" alt=" " class="smile" style="max-width:100%;"] I think I was so fired up by the removal of CC which I found particularly egregious that it didnt even dawn on me until listening to the BP podcast. Stupid Joe. If we don't win the series, its going down in history as one of the biggest epic managerial fails ever. Joe sitting there with his mouth open while any moron would have challenged. Still boils my blood. The only cure is to win the series. [thumbsup]
|
|
|
Post by chiyankee on Oct 9, 2017 9:09:13 GMT -5
I think I was so fired up by the removal of CC which I found particularly egregious that it didnt even dawn on me until listening to the BP podcast. Stupid Joe. If we don't win the series, its going down in history as one of the biggest epic managerial fails ever. Joe sitting there with his mouth open while any moron would have challenged. Still boils my blood. The only cure is to win the series. The fact that it Lindor coming up to the plate and there were already two outs, you have to challenge that play. Ugh!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by greatfatness on Oct 9, 2017 11:48:44 GMT -5
Nice warm welcome from the Yankees crowd for MicroJoe. Hopefully it didn't "mess up his rhythm".
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Oct 10, 2017 23:28:09 GMT -5
Mets ready to jump on Girardi according to the NYPost. Probably planted by Girardi's team for negotiating purposes.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyd46 on Oct 10, 2017 23:33:22 GMT -5
Mets ready to jump on Girardi according to the NYPost. Probably planted by Girardi's team for negotiating purposes. While I don't have a preference if he comes back or not I hope they win tomorrow and the Game 2 bs was just a memory like the Knoblach thing wound up being.
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Oct 10, 2017 23:40:15 GMT -5
Mets ready to jump on Girardi according to the NYPost. Probably planted by Girardi's team for negotiating purposes. While I don't have a preference if he comes back or not I hope they win tomorrow and the Game 2 bs was just a memory like the Knoblach thing wound up being. Yea if they win tomorrow he's probably coming back for sure. That's okay. I'll trade a game 5 win for Girardi returning. Though the best would be if they go on to win the championship and he retires to spend more time with his family. [whistle]
|
|
|
Post by anthonyd46 on Oct 11, 2017 1:14:09 GMT -5
While I don't have a preference if he comes back or not I hope they win tomorrow and the Game 2 bs was just a memory like the Knoblach thing wound up being. Yea if they win tomorrow he's probably coming back for sure. That's okay. I'll trade a game 5 win for Girardi returning. Though the best would be if they go on to win the championship and he retires to spend more time with his family. I honestly wouldn't rule that out either. I'm sure he would feel a sense of accomplishment with another championship since this one would be with no jeter, mo, etc.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Oct 11, 2017 8:29:33 GMT -5
I have a hard time believing that Girardi's future with the Yankees (from management's side) is tied in any way to the wins or losses of any future games in 2017. I also don't believe that one single blunder of not checking a replay would be the decision-maker. The season is long, and there is a lot going on with a group of 25 human beings in a clubhouse situation as well as within the context of the working relationship that the manager and front office personnel maintain. If Joe is staying or gone per management, the decision has likely already been made. I can see a man deciding on his individual future after the season and basing that decision somewhat on the results from here on out in 2017.
|
|
|
Post by Renfield on Oct 11, 2017 9:38:09 GMT -5
Agree, inger. I kind of felt sorry for him at his last press conference. That decision has clearly weighed on him the last few days.
|
|
|
Post by michcusejoe5 on Oct 11, 2017 10:47:05 GMT -5
I have a hard time believing that Girardi's future with the Yankees (from management's side) is tied in any way to the wins or losses of any future games in 2017. I also don't believe that one single blunder of not checking a replay would be the decision-maker. The season is long, and there is a lot going on with a group of 25 human beings in a clubhouse situation as well as within the context of the working relationship that the manager and front office personnel maintain. If Joe is staying or gone per management, the decision has likely already been made. I can see a man deciding on his individual future after the season and basing that decision somewhat on the results from here on out in 2017. The Red Sox have just fired John Farrell after a 93 win season and a second straight AL East title. Sure, different circumstances for the Yanks as this was not supposed to be a playoff year for the Yankees in the slightest and clearly overachieved (something that will work in Girardi's favor). However, Girardi has officially proven that he is capable of single-handedly costing the team games on the biggest stage. While the former has got to count for something, so does the latter.
|
|