|
Post by pippsheadache on Apr 18, 2022 16:36:55 GMT -5
Well you've got three of the immortals right there. I don't even know which one I like best. Gun to my head I guess I go with The Man In Black, but man those guys are fundamental. Amazing how many of the 60s and 70s rockers idolized Carl Perkins, who was well ahead of his time on the guitar. The happiest I've ever seen George Harrison look is the concert he did with Perkins and Dave Edmunds. The Beatles covered Carl Perkins more than they covered any other artist-- three times, with "Matchbox," "Honey Don't" and "Everybody's Trying To Be My Baby." Did Elvis Presley just eclipse Carl Perkins, the original “Blue Suede Shoes,” with real hair, better looks, and a voice for rock, gospel, and ballads? Well, Elvis was a phenomenon, no question. Much as I worship at the altar of Carl Perkins, there is no way his overall persona was going to match up against the magnificent dynamo that was Elvis. I have long maintained that Elvis Presley made more lousy songs -- not to mention lousy movies-- than maybe anyone who ever lived. But he's impossibly great. Someone with greater critical skill than me would have to explain how it works. The Beatles were so tongue-tied in his presence that they could hardly speak. Springsteen described him as "everything." People who weren't there at the time don't realize how enormously popular Elvis was with black listeners in his early days. Not the ridiculous Elvis of Las Vegas, but the Sun Studio Elvis. Hard to ignore Carl's bad toupee, isn’t it? It only got thicker and curlier as he aged. I guess you know the story about how he was in an auto accident on his way to do "Blue Suede Shoes" on "The Ed Sullivan Show." It kept him from some invaluable publicity and opened the way for Elvis's cover to be the bigger hit.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Apr 18, 2022 16:52:14 GMT -5
Great tune! I wasn’t aware of that one, so thanks. His entire career and life in front of him. He was ejected from the car in part due to throwing himself over his fiancé to protect her during the wreck. Like Buddy Holly and Jim Croce, all the music they would have made, evolving as they matured and grew in their craft. We can never know what was still inside those brains. Some artists burn out, and some just keep on going. Some are more amenable to doing music written by someone else, while others are only comfortable with their own tunes and tales. Different muses, too. Childhood, love, hatred, war, fighting, law-breaking, beauty of nature. Some to a hard metal beat, some to the violin. Some refrain from satisfying their personal agenda to make money, some walk away from the money to do what they most enjoy…
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Apr 18, 2022 17:18:24 GMT -5
Did Elvis Presley just eclipse Carl Perkins, the original “Blue Suede Shoes,” with real hair, better looks, and a voice for rock, gospel, and ballads? Well, Elvis was a phenomenon, no question. Much as I worship at the altar of Carl Perkins, there is no way his overall persona was going to match up against the magnificent dynamo that was Elvis. I have long maintained that Elvis Presley made more lousy songs -- not to mention lousy movies-- than maybe anyone who ever lived. But he's impossibly great. Someone with greater critical skill than me would have to explain how it works. The Beatles were so tongue-tied in his presence that they could hardly speak. Springsteen described him as "everything." People who weren't there at the time don't realize how enormously popular Elvis was with black listeners in his early days. Not the ridiculous Elvis of Las Vegas, but the Sun Studio Elvis. Hard to ignore Carl's bad toupee, isn’t it? It only got thicker and curlier as he aged. I guess you know the story about how he was in an auto accident on his way to do "Blue Suede Shoes" on "The Ed Sullivan Show." It kept him from some invaluable publicity and opened the way for Elvis's cover to be the bigger hit. I had forgotten about the car accident. Like Jerry Jeff Walker sang, "Life if mostly attitude and timing." I'm sure you've seen this photograph at Sun Studios. What talent in one place: Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Johnny Cash, and Jerry Lee Lewis:
|
|
|
Post by rizzuto on Apr 18, 2022 17:40:08 GMT -5
Great tune! I wasn’t aware of that one, so thanks. His entire career and life in front of him. He was ejected from the car in part due to throwing himself over his fiancé to protect her during the wreck. Like Buddy Holly and Jim Croce, all the music they would have made, evolving as they matured and grew in their craft. We can never know what was still inside those brains. Some artists burn out, and some just keep on going. Some are more amenable to doing music written by someone else, while others are only comfortable with their own tunes and tales. Different muses, too. Childhood, love, hatred, war, fighting, law-breaking, beauty of nature. Some to a hard metal beat, some to the violin. Some refrain from satisfying their personal agenda to make money, some walk away from the money to do what they most enjoy… Some artists appear to lose some magic once they become more sophisticated with arrangements and musicianship. Paul Simon wrote so many great songs early, and he has had success later in his career as well; however, Simon almost sounds resentful when asked about those old tunes. He has said in interviews that he is a much better musician and song writer than he was back then, but there is something about those early tunes that never grow tired, stale, or out of sync.
|
|
|
Post by chiyankee on Apr 18, 2022 18:20:40 GMT -5
We can never know what was still inside those brains. Some artists burn out, and some just keep on going. Some are more amenable to doing music written by someone else, while others are only comfortable with their own tunes and tales. Different muses, too. Childhood, love, hatred, war, fighting, law-breaking, beauty of nature. Some to a hard metal beat, some to the violin. Some refrain from satisfying their personal agenda to make money, some walk away from the money to do what they most enjoy… Some artists appear to lose some magic once they become more sophisticated with arrangements and musicianship. Paul Simon wrote so many great songs early, and he has had success later in his career as well; however, Simon almost sounds resentful when asked about those old tunes. He has said in interviews that he is a much better musician and song writer than he was back then, but there is something about those early tunes that never grow tired, stale, or out of sync. This is one of my favorite Paul Simon songs. Terrific lyrics and great baseline.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Apr 18, 2022 19:01:37 GMT -5
Some artists appear to lose some magic once they become more sophisticated with arrangements and musicianship. Paul Simon wrote so many great songs early, and he has had success later in his career as well; however, Simon almost sounds resentful when asked about those old tunes. He has said in interviews that he is a much better musician and song writer than he was back then, but there is something about those early tunes that never grow tired, stale, or out of sync. This is one of my favorite Paul Simon songs. Terrific lyrics and great baseline. Simon is one of those artists that doesn’t stand out in my thoughts, yet he never seemed to create a song I didn’t like. It was interesting how he evolved from his Simon and Garfunkel days to a solo act and even an adaptation to a sort of African/rumba mixture. He not only could sing the phone book and make it entertaining, he’d find a way to make it make sense. Here, he catches intrigue right away: “First thing I remember” and “my mother laughed the way some ladies do”. It brings his very birth into question, not to mention his mother’s habits and life style. I have very early memories, too. And I suppose that most of those do involve my mother and to a lesser extent my older siblings. I don’t know if I would have been cognizant of my mother having a man in her room. I’m sure she did, as I recall her boyfriend leaving when I was about two or so. Yet I remember nothing else about him. Just his car. I can still see the rear end of a green Studebaker through the window, heading down the road as mom said “Ray is leaving, and he’s never coming back.” She was probably crying, though I can’t say I noticed. They were together a couple years. He bought her a new kitchen stove at some point, and probably her wringer washer and a toaster. I believe one of my brothers once said he bought the kerosene space heater we stayed warm with… But a musical artist can weave all that into music, which I find amazing. I can’t. I don’t know how well I can tell the story, but it wouldn’t be through music…
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Apr 18, 2022 19:46:45 GMT -5
Some artists appear to lose some magic once they become more sophisticated with arrangements and musicianship. Paul Simon wrote so many great songs early, and he has had success later in his career as well; however, Simon almost sounds resentful when asked about those old tunes. He has said in interviews that he is a much better musician and song writer than he was back then, but there is something about those early tunes that never grow tired, stale, or out of sync. Paul Simon churned out great music for a much longer period than most musicians. I think some of them feel obligated to be dismissive of their early stuff -- I've read quotes from John Lennon and Bob Dylan, among others, responding that way -- almost as if it somehow reflects a lack of growth if they acknowledge how the music that put them on the map might have been their best. But with Paul Simon I pretty much like most of what he did from the mid-60s through at least well into the 80s. I think most people -- not everyone of course, but most people -- have a stronger emotional connection to the music they listened to as teenagers into maybe their 20s. You can still appreciate new music as you drift into middle age and beyond, but rarely does it mean as much. Simon seemed already world-weary in his early twenties. I guess he got off to a quick start.
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Apr 18, 2022 19:57:26 GMT -5
I suspect Simon was pretty stuck up which explains his comments. Garfunkle pointed out just how desperately he wanted credit for the songs.
In the sixties you could be experimental, by the 80's it was a business. It is harder to be original in that environment I suspect. And taste change. The sixties was amazingly diverse because people would pay for more diverse songs (and different eras overlapped, so Sinatra and Dean Martin could still have major hits, which is unlikely today).
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Apr 18, 2022 19:59:01 GMT -5
Simon with Mick and Madden doing "Me and Julio Down By The Schoolyard." www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6VrKro8djwOne of my favorites from the Simon and Garfunkel era was 1967's "Fakin' It." The cheery woman speaking in there was the secretary for the singer Donovan. The "Good morning Mr. Leitch" was a reference to his last name. www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkFBOd4YN60
|
|
|
Post by pippsheadache on Apr 18, 2022 20:05:16 GMT -5
I suspect Simon was pretty stuck up which explains his comments. Garfunkle pointed out just how desperately he wanted credit for the songs. In the sixties you could be experimental, by the 80's it was a business. It is harder to be original in that environment I suspect. And taste change. The sixties was amazingly diverse because people would pay for more diverse songs (and different eras overlapped, so Sinatra and Dean Martin could still have major hits, which is unlikely today). You're right, music was much more fragmented by the 80s, even by the 70s, than it had been in the 60s. In 1964, the same station that was playing "It's All Over Now" by the Stones would also be playing "Everybody Loves Somebody Sometime" by Dean Martin. I always thought it was illustrative of the time that the last Billboard Number One before The Beatles overwhelmed everything in early 64 was "There I've Said It Again" by Bobby Vinton and the song that ended their run of holding the top spot for several months was "Hello Dolly" by Louis Armstrong. And a lot of the same people were buying all of those records.
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Apr 18, 2022 20:19:52 GMT -5
I think music was more fragmented, more diverse, in the sixties than later which you may mean. I think we are using words differently, but meaning the same thing.
Part of the issue is that from 1960 to the beatles there is no dominant group of singer. Not many had a lot of hits in this era. Lot of specialty songs, folk music, girl groups, just about everything.
|
|
|
Post by noetsi on Apr 18, 2022 20:28:47 GMT -5
The sixties is my favorite era for music. There are some misremembered "facts" about it. One is that in began in 1960, in fact much of what we think about the music of the sixties does not start until Feb 1964 when the decade is almost half over (and it continued well into the seventies, decades are artificial constructs we give meaning to by ignoring history). Another is all the supposed protest music, particularly anti-war songs. While they existed, sky pilot comes to mind, few were popular in that decade. Fighting Men of the Green Beret was the number one song I think in 1965. And it was not anti-war. Armstrong's popularity, it continued to his death, was remarkable for a generation which stressed youth and often ridiculed earlier artists (often with scant knowledge of facts, the big band era was seen as the ultimate in old foggie music, at the time it was produced it was often seen as a radical challenge to the existing culture). Music was one of the few places before the sixties that minorities, women, and rural types could have significant cultural influence.
|
|
|
Post by kaybli on Apr 18, 2022 20:38:25 GMT -5
I much prefer your music analysis than your baseball analysis, noetsi.
|
|
|
Post by inger on Apr 18, 2022 21:00:51 GMT -5
I much prefer your music analysis than your baseball analysis, noetsi. Especially the “Old Foggies”. That one could come close to matching “BangWaggon” for all time greatest malapropisms of the forum…
|
|
|
Post by inger on Apr 18, 2022 21:04:51 GMT -5
The sixties is my favorite era for music. There are some misremembered "facts" about it. One is that in began in 1960, in fact much of what we think about the music of the sixties does not start until Feb 1964 when the decade is almost half over (and it continued well into the seventies, decades are artificial constructs we give meaning to by ignoring history). Another is all the supposed protest music, particularly anti-war songs. While they existed, sky pilot comes to mind, few were popular in that decade. Fighting Men of the Green Beret was the number one song I think in 1965. And it was not anti-war. Armstrong's popularity, it continued to his death, was remarkable for a generation which stressed youth and often ridiculed earlier artists (often with scant knowledge of facts, the big band era was seen as the ultimate in old foggie music, at the time it was produced it was often seen as a radical challenge to the existing culture). Music was one of the few places before the sixties that minorities, women, and rural types could have significant cultural influence. You surprised me here, Russ. I thought you might have been the elevator music type. You seem quite “hip” about the 60’s, my man. Like maybe you did a little “groovin”, on a Sunday afternoon. Riding on the storm. Finding your way to San Jose (put a hundred down and buy a car!)…
|
|